DBT for Eating Disorders
An eating disorder may look like a problem with food, but underneath it is often a struggle with emotions, thoughts, and the urge to escape discomfort. Restriction, binging, purging, and other behaviors can become increasingly automatic, offering brief relief while creating patterns that are difficult to break. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) approaches eating disorders by targeting the emotional and behavioral patterns underneath those cycles. Learn more about how each of DBT's four skill modules applies to eating disorders and what research suggests about the approach.
Jump to the topics:
Overview of DBT for Eating Disorders
Eating disorders rarely stay contained to the behaviors that get diagnosed: restriction, bingeing, purging, compulsive exercise. Underneath the behavior itself, one of the more consistent findings across the research is a nervous system that struggles to regulate emotion, to feel something hard and land somewhere other than food. That struggle is a large part of why an eating disorder can end up feeling less like a decision and more like the only tool that's ever reliably worked, even for someone who knows exactly how much damage it's doing.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) approaches that struggle directly rather than starting with food itself. Developed by psychologist Marsha Linehan in the 1990s to treat chronic suicidality and borderline personality disorder, it's organized around four skill areas, mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness, taught and practiced directly rather than explored primarily through conversation. Eating disorders weren't the original target population, but DBT skills training has since become one of the more common applications outside that original scope, particularly for binge eating, purging, and restrictive patterns that haven't responded well to other approaches.
That connection isn't just a clinical hunch. A network meta-analysis examining emotion regulation across the eating disorder spectrum found a consistent, strong link between difficulty regulating emotion and eating disorder symptoms, regardless of whether the specific behavior was restriction, bingeing, or purging. DBT's four modules were built almost entirely around that same difficulty, teaching people concrete ways to notice, tolerate, and act on hard emotions rather than routing them through food. That overlap is a large part of why the following four modules translate as directly as they do:
- Mindfulness rebuilds trust in the body's own signals. Eating disorders tend to replace hunger, fullness, and emotion with a set of external rules, calorie counts, timelines, checklists, that feel safer than listening to the body directly. Mindfulness teaches the difference between noticing a physical or emotional cue and immediately overriding it with a rule, which is often the first opening a person gets to eat, or stop eating, in response to the body rather than the rulebook.
- Distress tolerance covers the moments a meal or a mirror can't wait for. Not every urge to restrict, binge, or purge arrives on a schedule that allows for reflection. This module supplies fast, physical tools for the ten minutes after a triggering meal or comment, when the only realistic goal is getting through without acting on the urge.
- Emotion regulation addresses what builds up before the behavior. An eating disorder rarely appears out of nowhere; it tends to follow a buildup of shame, anxiety, or unprocessed anger that has nowhere else to go. This module works on that buildup directly, along with the secrecy that keeps a behavior feeding itself once it starts.
- Interpersonal effectiveness keeps the people who'd notice from being shut out. Eating disorders thrive on privacy, skipped meals nobody sees, a bathroom door that closes for a little too long, and isolation tends to follow close behind. This module gives people concrete ways to ask for what they need and stay in relationships instead of managing the disorder entirely alone.
Eating disorder behavior rarely responds to just one kind of intervention, which is part of why these four modules aren't meant to be used strictly one at a time. Multiple DBT skills from different modules can be combined to change a single behavior, pairing a mindfulness skill with an emotion regulation one, for example, when a binge urge and a wave of shame show up together, rather than treating each module as a separate toolkit. Learn more about skill stacking in the case study below.
This page covers each of the modules in more depth, along with what the research says about why the approach holds up for eating disorders specifically and not just for the conditions DBT was originally designed to treat. Together, they give someone a way to work through eating disorder behavior from more than one angle at once, steadying the hardest moments around food while also addressing the patterns that make the next episode more likely.
DBT vs. Other Treatments
Selecting the optimal psychotherapeutic intervention for eating disorders requires a clear understanding of how different treatment models target clinical maintenance mechanisms. Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) remains a primary evidence-based treatment for eating pathologies, operating from a cognitive-behavioral framework that identifies the cognitive overvaluation of shape and weight as the primary driver of dietary restriction, purging, and body checking. CBT-E is highly structured and utilizes cognitive restructuring, behavioral experiments, and exposure to feared foods to dismantle rigid dietary rules.
In contrast, standard DBT does not conceptualize the cognitive overvaluation of shape and weight as the primary driver of the illness, but rather views eating pathology as a secondary consequence of a core deficit in emotion regulation. Consequently, while CBT-E utilizes cognitive restructuring to eliminate dietary restraint, DBT utilizes a modular approach to build functional emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and mindfulness capabilities.
Comparative trials highlight that while CBT-E often achieves faster initial reductions in global eating disorder psychopathology and dietary restraint, DBT produces comparable, long-term clinical improvements. Specific patient profiles moderate the efficacy of these treatments:
- Alexithymia and Emotional Eating: Aggregated clinical datasets analyzed in moderator and predictor studies on binge eating interventions reveal that patients presenting with severe difficulties identifying and labeling internal emotional states (alexithymia) and those with elevated levels of emotional eating show significantly greater reductions in objective binge episodes when treated with DBT adapted for eating disorders (DBT-BED) compared to standard CBT.
- Weight/Shape Overvaluation: Conversely, patients with low baseline levels of weight and shape overvaluation, or those with less severe emotional dysregulation, often benefit more rapidly from CBT or CBT-E.
Additionally, clinicians must distinguish between standard DBT, which targets undercontrolled, impulsive behaviors (e.g., bingeing, purging, substance use), and Radically Open DBT (RO-DBT). Developed specifically for disorders of overcontrol, such as restrictive Anorexia Nervosa, chronic depression, and obsessive-compulsive personality traits, RO-DBT targets distinct neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms. Rather than addressing emotion dysregulation, RO-DBT targets social-signaling deficits, low openness to corrective feedback, cognitive rigidity, and emotional loneliness, using specialized skills to modulate neurophysiological threat arousal and cultivate authentic social connectedness.
National guidelines, such as those from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), highlight a stepped-care approach, detailed in reviews of binge eating disorder interventions. For Binge Eating Disorder (BED), first-line recommendations encourage initiating guided self-help before progressing to more specialized, therapist-led treatments like standard CBT, Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), Behavioral Weight Loss (BWL), or DBT.
In adolescents, Family-Based Treatment (FBT) is the primary model for restrictive eating, focusing on parental management of nutritional restoration. However, in adolescents presenting with severe co-occurring self-harm, active suicidality, or severe emotion dysregulation, integrating DBT skills with FBT provides a structured framework capable of targeting multiple self-damaging behaviors concurrently without losing clinical focus on eating-focused goals.
Psychoeducation as a Starting Point for Eating Disorders
WPsychoeducation is a structured, educational approach to a mental health condition: teaching someone to understand and manage what they're dealing with through information, skills, and practice, rather than delivering ongoing clinical treatment the way individual psychotherapy does. For eating disorders specifically, that distinction carries real weight, because so much of what maintains restriction, bingeing, or purging isn't a lack of willpower so much as a lack of accurate information: about hunger and fullness cues, about what a body actually needs to function, about the fact that a binge is usually a predictable response to restriction or unmanaged emotion rather than a character flaw.
A systematic review evaluating psychoeducation programs for children, adolescents, and their caregivers dealing with eating disorders found that structured educational interventions were consistently associated with weight gain, reduced eating disorder symptoms, and a lighter burden on caregivers supporting a loved one through recovery, even when delivered alongside other forms of treatment rather than replacing them.
That evidence holds up in adult samples too. A study testing a 12-week group psychoeducation program for adults with binge eating disorder, which paired instruction on the mechanics of bingeing with sessions on emotion regulation and assertive communication, found that the share of participants scoring above the clinical cutoff for binge eating fell from over 80 percent to just above half by the end of treatment, with the largest gains showing up in self-esteem and overall eating disorder symptom scores.
This is where TheraHive's approach comes in: putting DBT's four modules into practice through a live, group-based format rather than leaving them as concepts on a handout. The sessions themselves are psychoeducational, not a clinical treatment for an eating disorder on their own, which means the focus stays on teaching and rehearsing skills, alongside whatever therapy, medical monitoring, or nutritional support a person already has in place, not in place of it. Eating disorders carry real physical risk, and psychoeducation is never a substitute for medical care when someone's health is already compromised.
Meeting virtually also lowers the amount of friction involved in showing up every week. No commute, no waiting room, no small talk that circles back to food before session even starts, which matters for a population that already tends to avoid situations that feel exposing.
Mindfulness: Reconnecting Mind and Body
Mindfulness sits underneath every other DBT skill, and in eating disorder recovery it does a very specific job: rebuilding a mind-body connection that restriction, bingeing, or purging has usually worn down over months or years. Many people with eating disorders stop trusting hunger and fullness as reliable signals, either because the signals themselves get blunted from irregular eating, or because they've learned to override them with rules instead: a calorie count, a cutoff time, a number on a scale that decides whether eating is allowed today. Research on mindfulness and eating behavior describes this pattern as "eating in the absence of hunger," where an external cue or a hard feeling drives eating far more than an actual physical need does.
DBT breaks mindfulness down into specific, learnable skills rather than treating it as a vague instruction to be more present. Observe comes first, and it means noticing a sensation, a thought, or a wave of anxiety as it happens without immediately acting on it or pushing it away. Someone might practice observing the physical sensation of fullness after a meal, or the urge to check their stomach in a mirror, simply as information rather than as a command. Describe follows by putting language to what was just noticed, in plain, factual terms rather than a verdict. Saying "I am noticing an urge to restrict, and my chest feels tight" is a different sentence than "I need to skip dinner," even though an eating disorder tends to collapse the two into one. Participate asks for something different again: entering fully into an experience, including the act of eating itself, without the running commentary that usually accompanies it.
Alongside these sit the "How" skills, which shape the way the observe, describe, and participate skills get practiced. Approaching food and body thoughts non-judgmentally matters enormously here, since so much eating disorder thinking runs on moral language, a food gets labeled "good" or "bad," a day gets labeled a "success" or a "failure," and that judgment tends to fuel whatever restrictive or compensatory behavior comes next. Practicing one-mindfully means doing one thing at a time, actually eating a meal instead of eating while also calculating, monitoring, or checked out from the plate in front of a person.
Wise Mind is where these skills tend to point. It sits between purely emotional reactions and purely rule-based, analytical thinking, and it's often where eating disorder recovery actually happens: not in blind obedience to a meal plan, and not in giving in to every urge to restrict or binge, but somewhere that can hold both the body's needs and the emotional reality of the moment. In practice, this often looks like a body scan that helps someone tell the difference between physical hunger and emotional distress, or riding out an urge to binge, purge, or check the body long enough to notice that it rises, peaks, and eventually passes on its own.
Try one of our brief and calming mindfulness exercises below. For the full playlist of free mindfulness exercises, visit our YouTube channel.
Distress Tolerance: Survival Tools for Urges
Distress tolerance exists for the moments when emotional pain can't be resolved right away, and the goal shifts from fixing the feeling to simply getting through it without making things worse. Within DBT's model, eating disorder behavior, whether that's purging, bingeing, or a sudden clampdown on eating, functions as a fast, effective way to blunt an unbearable feeling. That's exactly why distress tolerance skills target the moment an urge shows up rather than trying to reason someone out of it first.
The STOP skill is often taught first, because it interrupts action before anything happens: stop, physically step back from whatever triggered the urge, whether that's the kitchen or a mirror, observe what's actually happening in the body and mind, and only then decide how to proceed.
TIP skills work on the body directly instead of the mind, using cold water to trigger a physiological reset, brief intense exercise, or slow, paced breathing to bring down extreme physical arousal fast. This matters most in the minutes after a meal, when panic about what was just eaten tends to peak and compensatory urges are strongest.
Some moments call for a slower approach. Sitting down to weigh the pros and cons of acting on an eating disorder urge against the pros and cons of tolerating the distress instead builds a kind of evidence someone can return to before the next crisis hits, rather than starting from scratch every time.
Self-soothing through the five senses, a specific texture, a familiar smell, a favorite song playing quietly, gives an overwhelmed nervous system somewhere to land that has nothing to do with food. Underneath all of this sits radical acceptance, which isn't about approving of a difficult reality, a body, a diagnosis, a moment of losing control, but about no longer spending energy fighting the fact that it's happening. That second fight, denying what's already true, is often what turns a hard hour into a genuinely dangerous one.
Eating disorders also borrow a few distress tolerance tools originally built for addiction treatment, an adaptation described in conceptual models of DBT skills for addiction and compulsions, since the underlying pattern, an urge that feels unbearable until it's acted on, looks similar across both. Dialectical abstinence holds the goal of stopping bingeing or purging altogether alongside a compassionate plan for what happens if a slip occurs, so that one hard day doesn't spiral into shame-driven relapse. Clear mind describes the steady middle ground between chasing immediate relief through eating disorder behavior and denying that the vulnerability to it still exists. Urge surfing, riding out a craving, a pull to restrict, or the urge to check the body in a mirror as something that rises and eventually falls on its own, gives someone a way to wait out the wave instead of obeying it.
Emotion Regulation: Interrupting Eating Disorder Patterns
Difficulty regulating emotion is one of the clearest threads running through eating disorder presentations. A longitudinal study tracking group DBT treatment for binge eating disorder found that improvement in emotion regulation, and a drop in difficulty naming emotions specifically, directly predicted the reduction in eating disorder symptoms that followed. The emotion regulation module works from that finding directly, teaching people to understand what they're feeling, lower their overall vulnerability to distress, and change the urges that show up once an emotion arrives.
That work often has to start earlier than it sounds like it should, because many people with eating disorders struggle to tell a physical sensation from an emotional one in the first place. A tight chest might get labeled as fullness instead of anxiety. A hollow, unsettled feeling might get read as hunger instead of sadness. DBT addresses this directly, teaching people to separate the physical sensation of an emotion from the thought attached to it and the urge that follows, rather than assuming all three are the same thing.
Opposite action is one of the more direct tools in this module. A single-case study testing opposite action found that deliberately acting against an emotion-driven urge produced an immediate drop in the intensity of that emotion. In eating disorder recovery, this looks different depending on what's underneath the urge. Fear of weight gain tends to produce an urge to skip a meal or leave the table, so opposite action means staying at the table and eating anyway until the anxiety comes down on its own. Shame after eating tends to produce an urge to isolate or purge in secret, so opposite action means reaching out to someone instead and saying what actually happened. Sadness can pull a person toward a private binge, so the opposite move is staying socially engaged and keeping meals on a predictable schedule, and frustration that would normally get rerouted into restrictive control over food gets expressed directly instead, in a way that doesn't involve the body at all.
Alongside these urge-based skills, the PLEASE skill targets the everyday physical factors that make emotional overwhelm more likely in the first place: untreated physical illness, irregular eating that leaves someone starving or overly full, mood-altering substances, poor sleep, and exercise that's either absent or compulsive. Building a sense of accomplishment outside of food or weight also matters here. Accumulating positive experiences and gradually building mastery in something unrelated to appearance gives self-esteem somewhere else to attach to besides the number on a scale.
Interpersonal Effectiveness: Staying Connected Instead of Hiding
Relationships and eating disorder symptoms tend to feed each other. Criticism about weight, a parent's comment at dinner, friction with a partner or a friend, all of it can trigger the kind of negative feeling that restriction or bingeing has learned to numb, and the secrecy an eating disorder requires tends to pull a person away from exactly the people who might otherwise help. Interpersonal effectiveness gives someone concrete ways to communicate instead of withdrawing further into the disorder.
When there's something specific to ask for, maybe that family members stop discussing diets at the table, or that a friend check in more during a hard week, DEAR MAN offers a structure for making the ask clearly: describing the situation factually, expressing feelings without hinting, asserting the actual request, and staying focused on that goal even if the conversation drifts toward an unrelated argument about food or appearance. When the priority is protecting a relationship through a disagreement rather than winning a specific point, GIVE shifts the approach toward staying gentle, genuinely curious about the other person's side, and willing to validate their concern, acknowledging a parent's worry about weight loss, for instance, without necessarily agreeing with how they've expressed it.
A third target matters just as much for eating disorders specifically: holding onto self-respect in the interaction itself. People with eating disorders often carry real perfectionism and a habit of shrinking their own needs to keep everyone else comfortable, agreeing to eat somewhere that feels unsafe, or apologizing for needing extra time at a meal. FAST works against that instinct directly: staying fair to both people in the exchange, skipping apologies that aren't actually necessary, sticking to values around recovery even when it would be easier to go along with what someone else wants, and staying honest rather than performing a version of things that feels safer to say out loud.
For a deep dive on DEAR MAN and other interpersonal effectiveness skills, check out the Thriving With DBT podcast episode below where TheraHive co-founder Dr. Alicia Smart walks through the skills in real-time with a real TheraHive student.
Research and Evidence Base for DBT in Eating Disorders
A robust body of peer-reviewed clinical literature evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of DBT for eating disorders across various diagnoses and age groups. A comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis on DBT for eating disorders pooled effect sizes across the existing trials and found significant improvements in general emotion regulation, depressive symptoms, global eating disorder psychopathology, objective binge frequencies, and BMI metrics.
Within binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa specifically, a controlled trial comparing DBT-BED to intensive CBT found that while CBT produced faster initial pathology clearance, DBT reached comparable rates of clinically meaningful change by the end of treatment. That pattern held up outside the research setting too: an effectiveness trial in routine clinical care confirmed that DBT achieves comparable long-term remission rates while requiring significantly less direct therapy time.
The evidence extends to younger patients as well. A systematic review and meta-analysis on adolescent DBT interventions demonstrated statistically significant reductions in objective binge episodes, self-induced vomiting, and EDE-Q global scores, and a further systematic review evidence for adolescent eating disorders confirms that DBT represents a highly feasible and effective option when standard family-based treatment is contraindicated.
For restrictive anorexia nervosa, where RO-DBT is the more commonly studied variant, a landmark inpatient evaluation of RO-DBT for adult anorexia nervosa demonstrated a 72% completion rate, large BMI gains, and a 90% clinical response rate. Those findings were echoed in an outpatient RO-DBT clinical trial, which showed high retention at 83% alongside significant symptom reduction, and a case series on an adolescent day program incorporating RO-DBT showed significant improvements in underlying overcontrol traits such as cognitive rigidity and social connectedness.
Delivery format matters, too. A secondary analysis of a self-guided digital DBT app trial showed small-to-moderate improvements in emotional clarity, distress tolerance, and mindfulness observing among adults with recurrent binge eating, lending support to the dissemination of modular DBT skills through mobile platforms. And for patients navigating eating pathology alongside borderline personality disorder, a 12-month study on standard DBT enhanced with cognitive-behavioral strategies confirmed significant post-treatment reductions in both borderline symptoms and eating pathology, with gains in coping skills directly correlating with symptom reduction.
Repeated practice of new ways of responding is how the brain builds and strengthens the pathways behind them, gradually changing the patterns that can keep eating disorders going. The video below walks through that behavioral science in more depth, including why slipping back into familiar eating-disorder behaviors while practicing new ones is a normal part of the process, not a sign that the skills aren’t working.
Finding the Right Support
Eating disorders don't all start from the same place, and people tend to come to DBT skills from different angles depending on what's driving the behavior in the first place. Some start with distress tolerance because a specific moment, a mirror, a stressful meal, a wave of shame, tends to trigger a binge or a restriction rush, and they need something for that moment specifically. Others start with emotion regulation because the eating disorder has become the main tool they have for managing feelings that otherwise feel unmanageable. There's no single right entry point, and a structured, virtual group format tends to make it easier to stay consistent no matter which module feels most urgent at the start.
If the mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness skills covered on this page sound like tools that could help, TheraHive's online DBT skills groups walk through this same four-module structure with a trained facilitator and a small group of peers working through similar challenges. This kind of psychoeducational program is meant to complement, not replace, individual therapy, medical monitoring, or nutritional support a person may already have in place. Eating disorders carry real physical risk, and anyone in acute medical crisis, or newly diagnosed and still being evaluated, should have a full clinical team in place before or alongside any skills-based group work.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DBT or CBT-E better for eating disorders?
They're not always answering the same question. CBT-E is highly structured around identifying and correcting the cognitive overvaluation of shape and weight, and it remains one of the most established, evidence-based options for many eating disorders. DBT starts from a different place: rather than treating that overvaluation as the primary driver, it treats eating disorder behavior as a downstream consequence of a core struggle with emotion regulation, and builds skills for handling that struggle directly. Comparative trials suggest CBT-E often produces faster initial symptom reduction, but the two tend to land in a similar range by the end of treatment. For someone whose bingeing, purging, or restriction is more clearly tied to difficulty identifying or tolerating emotion than to rigid rules about weight and shape, DBT is often worth considering as the closer fit.
Can DBT help if my eating disorder doesn't involve bingeing or purging?
Yes, though the specific version of DBT that fits best can differ. Standard DBT was built for undercontrolled, impulsive behaviors like bingeing or purging, and its skills translate directly to those patterns. Restrictive eating disorders, including anorexia, more often involve the opposite pattern: rigid rule-following, difficulty deviating from a plan, and discomfort with anything unpredictable. For that presentation, a DBT variant called Radically Open DBT (RO-DBT) is typically the closer match, since it was built specifically around the overcontrol patterns standard DBT wasn't designed to target. Either way, difficulty with food isn't a requirement for DBT's skills to be useful; difficulty with emotional flexibility usually is.
How do online DBT skills groups work for eating disorders?
An online DBT skills group typically meets on a regular weekly schedule with a small group of participants and a trained facilitator, working through the same four modules covered on this page: mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness. Sessions are psychoeducational rather than individual psychotherapy or medical nutrition therapy, so the focus stays on learning and practicing skills, meant to complement any therapy, medical monitoring, or dietitian support a person is already receiving rather than replace it.
How do I know if a DBT skills group is right for me if I have an eating disorder?
DBT skills groups tend to fit best when an eating disorder is tied to difficulty regulating emotion, when food has become the main way of managing stress, shame, or anxiety, or when eating disorder behavior hasn't fully responded to standard treatment on its own. If those patterns sound familiar, and structured skills practice feels more useful right now than open-ended talk therapy, DBT is generally worth considering as a next step.
It isn't a diagnostic tool, and it isn't a substitute for medical care or nutritional treatment when those are what's needed. Someone in acute medical crisis, or newly diagnosed and not yet medically stable, should start with a full clinical evaluation first. For the ongoing patterns covered throughout this page, emotion-driven bingeing, restriction used to manage distress, and difficulty tolerating urges around food, DBT skills groups are built to address exactly that territory.
What happens in a DBT skills group session?
A typical session opens with a short mindfulness exercise, checks in on how the past week's skill practice went, teaches one new skill from that week's module with concrete examples tied to eating disorder situations, and closes with a specific practice assignment for the coming week. Sessions are structured and group-based rather than open-ended discussion about food or weight.
Participants are never asked to disclose specific details about their eating disorder behaviors that they aren't comfortable sharing, and the format stays consistent from week to week, which matters for eating disorders specifically, since unpredictability around meals and routines is often part of what maintains the disorder in the first place. Over the course of a program, sessions move through all four modules in sequence: mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness.
Is online DBT as effective as in-person for eating disorders?
Early research comparing online and in-person DBT skills training suggests outcomes for skill acquisition and symptom reduction are broadly comparable, though the evidence base is still smaller than for in-person delivery overall. For eating disorders specifically, virtual delivery carries one added advantage worth naming: it removes the need to eat in front of unfamiliar people in a clinical setting, which can feel exposing for someone who's already hyperaware of being watched while eating.
References
Braden, A., Anderson, L., Redondo, R., Watford, T., Emley, E., & Ferrell, E. (2021). Emotion Regulation Mediates Relationships Between Perceived Childhood Invalidation, Emotional Reactivity, and Emotional Eating. Journal of Health Psychology
Brownley, K. A., Berkman, N. D., Peat, C. M., Lohr, K. N., Cullen, K. E., Bann, C. M., & Bulik, C. M. (2016). Binge-Eating Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine
Federici, A., & Wisniewski, L. (2012). Description of an Intensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy Program for Multidiagnostic Clients With Eating Disorders. Journal of Counseling & Development
Grilo, C. M., Reas, D. L., & Mitchell, J. E. (2016). Combining Pharmacotherapy and Psychological Treatments for Binge-Eating Disorder: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions. Current Psychiatry Reports
Huang, W., Zhang, Z., Han, H., Gao, R., Gu, L., Peng, S., & Chen, J. (2026). Wise Eating: A Guided Dialectical Behavior Therapy-Based APP for Binge Eating—A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders
Kao, T.-S. A., Ling, J., Alanazi, M., & Atwa, A. (2024). Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Obesogenic Eating Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obesity Reviews
Lammers, M. W., Vroling, M. S., Crosby, R. D., & van Strien, T. (2022). Dialectical Behavior Therapy Compared to Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Binge-Eating Disorder: An Effectiveness Study With 6-Month Follow-Up. International Journal of Eating Disorders
Lammers, M. W., Vroling, M. S., Crosby, R. D., Mares, S. H. W., Hutschemaekers, G. J. M., & van Strien, T. (2026). Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Individuals With Binge-Eating Disorder: What Works for Whom? International Journal of Eating Disorders
Linardon, J., Anderson, C., McClure, Z., Liu, C., Messer, M., Jarman, H. K., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2024). A Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training Smartphone App for Recurrent Binge Eating: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Psychological Medicine
Lynch, T. R., Gray, K. L. H., Hempel, R. J., Titley, M., Chen, E. Y., & O'Mahen, H. A. (2013). Radically Open-Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adult Anorexia Nervosa: Feasibility and Outcomes From an Inpatient Program. BMC Psychiatry
McColl, C., Hindle, S., & Donkin, L. (2024). “I Mean, It Kind of Saved My Life, to Be Honest”: A Qualitative Study of Participants’ Views of a Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Multidiagnostic Eating Disorders Programme. Journal of Eating Disorders
O'Reilly, G. A., Cook, L., Spruijt-Metz, D., & Black, D. S. (2014). Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Obesity-Related Eating Behaviors: A Literature Review. Obesity Reviews
Reilly, E. E., Orloff, N. C., Luo, T., Berner, L. A., Brown, T. A., Claudat, K., Kaye, W. H., & Anderson, L. K. (2020). Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Adolescent Eating Disorders: A Review of Existing Work and Proposed Future Directions. Eating Disorders
Ritschel, L. A., Lim, N. E., & Stewart, L. M. (2015). Transdiagnostic Applications of DBT for Eating Disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology
Soliman, O. M., Messer, M., Skvarc, D., Moffitt, R. L., & Linardon, J. (2025). Exploring the Role of Mindfulness, Emotion Regulation, and Distress Tolerance During Delivery of a Dialectical Behaviour Therapy App for Recurrent Binge Eating. Eating Disorders
Wisniewski, L., & Ben-Porath, D. D. (2015). Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders: The Use of Contingency Management Procedures to Manage Dialectical Dilemmas. American Journal of Psychotherapy
Zeeck, A., et al. (2023). Binge-Eating Disorder Interventions: Review, Current Status, and Implications. Current Psychiatry Reports
.avif){kind=icon}